Viewing Event Record: Requests, Blagrave vs Babham: Blagrave replies

Abstract

William Blagrave's short replication to Christopher Babham's answer simply asserts that all his own previous statements are true, and that Babham's are so 'imperfect, uncertian, and insufficient' that they require no further response.

Date Event Recorded

Date
From: 20 June 1632 (Source of claim: original)

Date Event Happened

Date
From: 15 October 1629 To: 20 June 1632 (Source of claim: transcription)

Venues

Name
Salisbury Court

People

Name Event Role(s) Document Role(s)
Hammerton, Stephen apprentice
Babham, Christopher defendant company manager
Blagrave, William plaintiff Master of Revels, deputy

Related Primary Sources

Event Type

  • company business
  • company context
  • court case
  • player context